Child Custody in Pakistan After Divorce by court:
If from family court you wish to obtain child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The Child Custody Law in Pakistan, Is very clear and in favor of wife. Judgment of the Court below not by the law, High Court can declare it can restore the lower court’s judgment for child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan.
Suit Against Husband:
In her former Suit against her husband, the wife had stated that the dower amount was fixed at a specified sum; the whole claim in that Suit was accepted to be accurate by the husband while making a statement before the court. Averments in the first Suit cannot subsequently be permitted to be altered in evidence. Contention not raised before Family Court cannot be allowed to be presented in Constitutional petition. High Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot sit as a Court of appeal and cannot substitute findings of fact recorded by Courts below.
Such matters should be decided by Courts invested with jurisdiction to fix them. They recall witnesses. Family Court dismissing the application for identifying witness, such order does not fall within the decision and, therefore, is not appealable for child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Trial Court summoning specified person as a witness, a discretionary interlocutory order not amenable to appeal. Family Court presided by Civil Judge, whatever the amount of dower, the decree shall be appealable only before the District Judge. Amount decreed by such Family Court would have no place in determining the forum of appeal. The petitioner contended that it did not specifically mention gold ornaments in the plaint.
Family Lawyer in Lahore:
Regarding the child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan it duly said gold ornaments in the list attached with the objection, and their weight was mentioned in the prayer clause of the complaint. Petitioner, filing applications and petitions, had been increasing the miseries of decree-holder to satisfy his ego and deprive the decree-holder of her ornaments of gold or value thereof. The constitutional petition was dismissed. High Court cannot substitute its findings with lower Courts merely because it could take another view from raiding of evidence for child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan.
The appellate authority is the Superior Court of fact, and the judgment and decree rendered by the appellate authority are based on evidence. No misreading and non-reading of evidence are judicial effects pointed out, a reappraisal of evidence not permissible in constitutional jurisdiction unless miscarriage of justice is shown to have occasioned. The cash could be treated as wife’s personal property under Entry No.9 of the Schedule of Family Courts Act, 1964, was yet to be determined based on evidence to be recorded by the parties for child custody in Pakistan after divorce through family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Court had prima facie presumed the same to be the personal property of wife for further determination. The impugned order was purely interlocutory, against which an appeal was not available under the law.